Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

Important!

1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
4. If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
   • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.

This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 04:55 on 6 February 2025 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

Bot-reported

• 209.188.72.93 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1292 (LTA 1292, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:49, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
• 27.32.189.66 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:09, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
• 38.43.32.97 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1292 (LTA 1292, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:22, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  Warned. Izno (talk) 02:38, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

• MessageApp (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1311 (LTA 1311, details). Note: Please see the comment(s) at the top of filter 1311 before taking any action. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:18, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  Looks like an FP. Izno (talk) 03:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

• 蒙古天骄 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:52, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
• 43.226.6.202 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

• 2600:100c:b21c:f650:b5c3:189b:9168:f23 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) User made an edit that basically insulted an editor but user also quickly removed the insult part. [1]. MysticCipher87(alt-account) (talk) 00:35, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

  Page protected for a bit. Izno (talk) 02:43, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

• Sendnoots49 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Continues to vandalise after warnings. Replys to warning (here and [2] seemingly indicate this is an obvious vandal who is WP:NOTHERE. Leventio (talk) 03:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
• 110.145.214.50 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Did a weird formatting screwup on Compassion tonight, and has been warned multiple times in the past for random mischief. Kaasterly (talk) 03:38, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
• King TransitMA (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Making legal threats on edit summary. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 04:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
• EpicSeagull420777 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On United States Navy (diff): vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Remsense ‥ 论 04:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
• TpcTh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – An account purely for spam, as evident from edits to userpage and 2 articles Peloneous(t)[c] 04:21, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
• CoolGuy420777 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On United States Navy: actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Remsense ‥ 论 04:30, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
• 2603:7081:5340:E6B:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) – known LTA user who does nothing but unexplained date changes. FMSky (talk) 04:42, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
• PharaohCrab (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Editor PharaohCrab on 17 November 2024 added an image into the Kek (mythology) article which appears to contain a photoshopped image of the politicised Pepe the Frog image. The image which Editor PharaohCrab added has nothing to do with Egyptian mythology, and he did not provide veriable reliable sources for his addition. I have thusly reverted his addition from 17 November 2024 back to the original image. Unfortunately, Editor PharaohCrab has kept adding the image back without providing any verifiable reliable source. He has received 4 warnings on his talk page, but he keeps re-adding the fake photoshopped image back into the said article without providing any reliable source for his addition. The impression is created as if the Kek (mythology) article being politicised with the Pepe the Frog imagery. Could an administrator please take a look at this? Thank you. 77.7.215.64 (talk) 04:49, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
• TrumpHarris (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Clearly not here to contribute constructively. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 04:55, 6 February 2025 (UTC)